> From: Frank Ellermann [mailto:nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de] > > there's no particular reason for members of this WG to be > > second guessing whether the content of ISO 639-3 is good > > enough for use in the LSR. > > IBTD. If it appears to list "anything" it would hurt the > deployment of 4646bis. May I suggest that if one is willing to read the FDIS text, it would be reasonably clear that it doesn't aim to list "anything". > The "interesting" types A, C, E, H, and S (what's H ?) The type "historic" refers to historical precursors to modern languages; e.g. Middle English. Peter _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.