[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?



John Cowan wrote:
 
>> I think we can expect them to go away.
 
> Go away, I hasten to add, *before* the publication of IS 639-3,
> and therefore before 4645bis.

Thanks, I appreciate it.

Frank

[[ The last time I had anything to do with DIN was in the early
   80's about obscure German sort order rules, and it wasn't me
   who paid for their paper.  "Ask your national standards body"
   is no procedure I'm used to, it sounds like a recipe by you-
   know-who.  If it's about contry codes I'd ask Debbie, not DIN.
]]



_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.