Hi - > From: "Sue Ellen Wright" <sellenwright at gmail.com> > To: "Doug Ewell" <dewell at adelphia.net>; "christian.galinski at chello.at" <Christian.Galinski at chello.at>; "Håvard Hjulstad" <havard at hjulstad.com>; "Jennifer DeCamp" <jdecamp at mitre.org> > Cc: "Gerhard Budin" <gerhard.budin at univie.ac.at>; "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org> > Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 5:00 AM > Subject: [Ltru] Re: Liaison with TC37/SC2 > > Dear colleagues, > I think a formal liaison between TC 37/SC 2 and the IETF/LTRU WG is > essential. There have been many informal discussions over the years because > many of us know each other, but it's really important that the working > relationship be as close and cooperative as possible. (I've just spent a few > hours in the last few days studying the new documents that have been posted > for BCP 47.) I personally am not directly involved in the language code WG, > although I try to track what is happening on all fronts on an ongoing basis. > Not an easy task, actually! Can anyone tell me just what sort of arrangement > if any exists, or do we need to initiate action to establish formal liaison? ... Keep in mind that the IETF ltru WG should cease to exist sometime in early 2007. Randy ltru co-chair _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.