[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry deltas



Mark Davis wrote:

We need to reach consensus on this. I see two basic options.

A. Allow inverted names with commas, but otherwise no commas (outside of parentheticals). For consistency, also invert all the other names that could reasonably be inverted.

ALLOW: Description: Ambae, West
REPLACE Description: Naga, Maring
WITH Description: Naga; Maring
REPLACE Description: Northern Sotho
WITH Description: Sotho, Northern

B. Disallow inverted names.

REPLACE: Description: Ambae, West
WITH: Description: West Ambae
REPLACE Description: Naga, Maring
WITH Description: Naga; Maring

There shouldn't be any Description fields with a semicolon separating two alternative names. They should be two Description fields instead:

Description: Naga
Description: Maring

That, of course, assumes this is a valid example, and "nng" really does have the two alternative names "Naga" and "Maring." That seems unlikely considering the existence of "mbw", which is also called "Maring."

I did a quick & dirty dump of all description names containing ","

I can't verify the accuracy of much of this list, but one clear error stood out:

CHANGE TO SEMI-COLON

Yi, Sichuan    =>    Yi; Sichuan

This is currently listed in ISO 639-2 as "Sichuan Yi."

Likewise:

Nahuatl, Highland Puebla    =>    Nahuatl; Highland Puebla

intuitively seems wrong. I suggest if we want to embark on this, we have to go beyond the data files and look each of these up interactively on the 639-3 Web site, which does include both the inverted and non-inverted forms. Sometimes, as in the case of Sichuan Yi, this may even require going to the linked Ethnologue page.

--
Doug Ewell  *  Fullerton, California, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.