Doug Ewell wrote: > I will wait until one of the co-chairs has declared a rough > consensus on this issue before releasing draft-4645bis-01. If there are any modifications in your -01pre better submit it before the IETF 67 cut-off (next Monday) and let's see it. Randy and Martin can't make up such decisions, they need to see some discussions on the list first, and ideally proposed text (or alternative proposals like Mark's A vs. B). At the moment I'm not sure what's better, I like the output of B better than A. Apparently B keeps all "xyz, adjective" together in a list sorted by descriptions, that's a feature. Apparently B tosses out any original "adjective xyz", that's bad. And apparently B requires to replace some commata by semicolons based on manual inspection, that's utter dubious: If the source is buggy it has to be fixed. Frank _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.