Frank Ellermann <nobody at xyzzy dot claranet dot de> wrote:
I will wait until one of the co-chairs has declared a rough consensus on this issue before releasing draft-4645bis-01.Randy and Martin can't make up such decisions, they need to see some discussions on the list first, and ideally proposed text (or alternative proposals like Mark's A vs. B).
I didn't ask them to make anything up. They need to decide and declare what "the group" wants, the rough consensus, based on however many contributions they get. If there aren't enough contributions to make a determination, for some value of "enough," they need to decide whether to fall back to "do it," "don't do it," or "cajole more responses out of the group."
It's not helping for us to take the informal approach and assume everyone knows what course of action we are following. There are obviously some very strong differences of opinion on this exact-description issue.
-- Doug Ewell * Fullerton, California, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14 http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/ http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.