[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Re: Inversions and other problems





On 10/17/06, Addison Phillips <addison at yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
Mark Davis wrote:
>     For a given record type, each Description field MUST be unique.
>
>
> I'd like slightly string.

Mnrgle?

ypu, srory!

>
> For a given record type, each Description field (after removing any
> parantheticals and inverting any comma-separated strings) MUST be unique.
>

No, actually, if two of the same description field appear anywhere in
the file, something is wrong. We wouldn't want:


Subtag: xx
Description: Western Xish
%%
Subtag: xy
Description: Western Xish

If what you're say is that the following should also be prohibited, I agree:

Yes, that's what it means. "For a given record type, each Description field (after removing any parantheticals and inverting any comma-separated strings) MUST be unique." means that if we have

Description: Western Xish

then each of the following is disallowed, anywhere else (under the same type, of course!):

Description: Western Xish
Description: Western Xish (Amusing)
Description: Xish, Western (Amusing)
Description: Xish, Western

Subtag: xx
Description: Western Xish
%%
Subtag: xy
Description: Xish, Western

Addison

--
Addison Phillips
Globalization Architect -- Yahoo! Inc.

Internationalization is an architecture.
It is not a feature.

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.