Peter Constable <petercon at microsoft dot com> wrote:
Re the duplicate "Dimli", it would seem reasonable to me to employ the same mechanism that 639-3 uses: "Dimli (macrolanguage)".
Kent Karlsson <kent dot karlsson14 at comhem dot se> replied:
I still very much dislike a parenthetical "(macrolanguage)" (or "(collection)" if that is the case, or "(individual)") in a name. "Dimli languages" maybe, or use an alternate name for the "macrolanguage" if one of the alternatives already refer more to the "macrolanguage" (Zaza?) than the others, or similar would be preferable. (But ok, not for LTRU to decide.)
Before we address this or any other specific case, we must agree on whether the Registry can deviate from names in the ISO standards.
-- Doug Ewell * Fullerton, California, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14 http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/ http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.