[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Re: fon* variants



At 14:49 06/12/10, John Cowan wrote:
>Mark Davis scripsit:
>
>> The only remaining outlying case is POSIX, which we didn't think
>> the ietf-languages group would buy off on. (It basically means using
>> "neutral" terms corresponding to usage in computer languages).
>
>That sounds very like i-default to me.

I was just thinking the same when I read Mark's mail.

But as usual, John is ahead!

Regards,    Martin.


#-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-#  http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp       mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp     


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.