On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 05:56:41AM -0800,
Doug Ewell <dewell at adelphia.net> wrote
a message of 27 lines which said:
> At some point during the development of 4646, somebody argued that
> both cases needed to be specified.
He was clearly wrong. (But I sympathetize, I made the same mistake at
the beginning.)
> Can you find an RFC that states unequivocally that ABNF strings are
> case-insensitive?
Besides the good reference given by John Cowan, I would like to add
that RFC which do want case-sensitivity have to use numeric
values. See for instance how RFC 4627 describes the string "false"
(lowercase only):
false = %x66.61.6c.73.65 ; false
I may add that every ABNF implementation I know of treats strings in a
case-insensitive way (as required by the RFC).
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.