Addison Doug Ewell wrote:
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic dot fr> wrote:At some point during the development of 4646, somebody argued that both cases needed to be specified.He was clearly wrong. (But I sympathetize, I made the same mistake at the beginning.)I wonder if anyone can find the thread on this list, many months ago, where someone argued that we had to specify both cases explicitly. Our original ABNF assumed case insensitivity. I'd hate to go through the process all over again of changing it, changing it back, etc.Can you find an RFC that states unequivocally that ABNF strings are case-insensitive?Besides the good reference given by John Cowan, I would like to add that RFC which do want case-sensitivity have to use numeric values. See for instance how RFC 4627 describes the string "false" (lowercase only):false = %x66.61.6c.73.65 ; falseI may add that every ABNF implementation I know of treats strings in a case-insensitive way (as required by the RFC).-- Doug Ewell * Fullerton, California, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14 http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/ http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
-- Addison Phillips Globalization Architect -- Yahoo! Inc. Internationalization is an architecture. It is not a feature. _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.