Doug Ewell wrote: > At some point during the development of 4646, somebody argued that > both cases needed to be specified. Not in LTRU, maybe before (?) > the production for "irregular" is now an enumeration of the valid tags > but only in their canonical casing style. That's fine, "en-GB-oed" matches also "en-gb-oed" and... > "EN-GB-OED" is also a valid irregular tag. ...with Addison's proposal to add a note about this ABNF-feature 4646bis can now finally eliminate one of "x" / "X". Frank _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.