RE: [Ltru] N'Ko again
"Don Osborn" <dzo@bisharat.net> Sun, 21 January 2007 15:50 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H8exI-0005JW-72; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 10:50:04 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H8exG-0005IS-IL for ltru@ietf.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 10:50:02 -0500
Received: from [64.39.15.8] (helo=kabissa.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H8evE-000378-D2 for ltru@ietf.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 10:47:57 -0500
Received: (qmail 16820 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2007 09:47:48 -0600
Received: from cust180.fastlink.bt (HELO IBM92AA25595C4) (202.89.26.180) by kabissa.org with SMTP; 21 Jan 2007 09:47:48 -0600
From: Don Osborn <dzo@bisharat.net>
To: 'Doug Ewell' <dewell@adelphia.net>, 'LTRU Working Group' <ltru@ietf.org>
References: <009801c73d36$8ad5e370$6601a8c0@DGBP7M81>
In-Reply-To: <009801c73d36$8ad5e370$6601a8c0@DGBP7M81>
Subject: RE: [Ltru] N'Ko again
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 21:16:44 +0530
Message-ID: <071301c73d73$789f55f0$69de01d0$@net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Acc9NqWmg3ysndcnSUeTTZ95zDSn8wAOSEKQ
Content-Language: en-us
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 39bd8f8cbb76cae18b7e23f7cf6b2b9f
Cc:
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
2019 being the hex code for headache? Either way it might make sense to list both, in the manner you suggest. No telling if someone might resort to 02BC (=migrane?), but maybe we don't have to go there. N' sort of functions as a unit in Latin transcriptions of Manding (meaning "I," 1st person singular), not standardized for the kind of apostrophe used, AFAIK, even when used as part of the name N'Ko. Don -----Original Message----- From: Doug Ewell [mailto:dewell@adelphia.net] Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 2:01 PM To: LTRU Working Group Subject: [Ltru] N'Ko again The draft 639-3 tables show "N'Ko" with a straight ASCII apostrophe. The current Registry has "Description: N’Ko" and I believe it got that way through registration on the part of ietf-languages. For 4646bis, is it correct to leave "N’Ko" in the Registry, but add "N'Ko" with the ASCII apostrophe, and make that one first in the order due to its role as 639-3 reference name? -- Doug Ewell * Fullerton, California, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14 http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/ http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
- [Ltru] N'Ko again Doug Ewell
- RE: [Ltru] N'Ko again Don Osborn
- [Ltru] Re: N'Ko again Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ltru] N'Ko again Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] N'Ko again John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] N'Ko again Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] N'Ko again Martin Duerst
- Re: [Ltru] N'Ko again Doug Ewell
- RE: [Ltru] N'Ko again Debbie Garside