RE: [Ltru] Extended language tags
"Don Osborn" <dzo@bisharat.net> Fri, 05 October 2007 03:42 UTC
Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ide5U-0005xk-Q2; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 23:42:52 -0400
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ide5T-0005uE-Ma for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 23:42:51 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ide5T-0005qt-Bx for ltru@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 23:42:51 -0400
Received: from 113166.kabissa.org ([72.32.199.201] helo=kabissa.org) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ide5O-0003JS-QF for ltru@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 23:42:47 -0400
Received: (qmail 598 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2007 22:42:34 -0500
Received: from pool-71-252-61-101.washdc.east.verizon.net (HELO IBM92AA25595C4) (71.252.61.101) by 72.32.229.137 with SMTP; 4 Oct 2007 22:42:34 -0500
From: Don Osborn <dzo@bisharat.net>
To: 'Andrew Cunningham' <lang.support@gmail.com>, ltru@ietf.org
References: <E1IdT7z-0001vv-Ly@megatron.ietf.org> <C9BF0238EED3634BA1866AEF14C7A9E55A597AC370@NA-EXMSG-C116.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <9d70cb000710041801k44ee5016u7374af1e1a17f6bc@mail.gmail.com> <000001c806f1$a041a200$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <9d70cb000710041936l7ec4e361w770e9ae873cec4d2@mail.gmail.com> <9d70cb000710041940w6df2268auc851423adba66511@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9d70cb000710041940w6df2268auc851423adba66511@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [Ltru] Extended language tags
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 23:42:30 -0400
Message-ID: <003901c80701$c202bc20$46083460$@net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcgG+S/hYWXxb8r+TlK3F4nftuussAABPb3Q
Content-Language: en-us
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b19722fc8d3865b147c75ae2495625f2
Cc:
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
> -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Cunningham [mailto:lang.support@gmail.com] ... > But at the moment, the way I'm using "din" is as an > unspecified variety of Dinka not covered by the current > ISO-639-3 codes". ... Which seems to be saying that in this case there is need for an appropriate level of imprecision in the tagging, and that this is met by the macrolanguage code alone (which is in 639-3 also, as I read it). I'm thinking that this is not so much the exception, but a situation that can arise with many other (macro)languages where there is no formal standard. I can see the point of having a tag to describe a standardized form, if such a formal standardization is arrived at (though I'm not sure where discussions are re ar and Standard Arabic). But what if usages just keep crossing or blurring the lines among "languages" within the "macrolanguage"? This is not just limited to Dinka - there were a few publications in Fulfulde a while back (one title was Janng'en Fulfulde as I recall) that deliberately tried to address a range of speakers (to the point of having footnotes to clarify usage in specific dialects where these were markedly different). Nowadays, anyone could try that on a website, blog or Wikipedia. In such a case wouldn't the ISO 639-1/2 code (ff/ful) be appropriate? Maybe there's no argument here, but I wanted to underscore this perspective before letting it be. Don _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
- [Ltru] Re: Extended language tags Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Extended language tags Shawn Steele
- Re: [Ltru] Extended language tags Andrew Cunningham
- Re: [Ltru] Extended language tags Mark Davis
- RE: [Ltru] Extended language tags Don Osborn
- Re: [Ltru] Extended language tags Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] Extended language tags Andrew Cunningham
- Re: [Ltru] Extended language tags Andrew Cunningham
- Re: [Ltru] Extended language tags Andrew Cunningham
- Re: [Ltru] Extended language tags Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] Extended language tags John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Extended language tags Addison Phillips
- RE: [Ltru] Extended language tags Don Osborn
- [Ltru] Re: Extended language tags Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Extended language tags John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Extended language tags Randy Presuhn
- RE: [Ltru] Extended language tags Shawn Steele
- Re: [Ltru] Extended language tags John Cowan
- RE: [Ltru] Extended language tags Peter Constable
- RE: [Ltru] Extended language tags Peter Constable
- RE: [Ltru] Extended language tags Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] Extended language tags Addison Phillips
- Re: [Ltru] Extended language tags (long reply) Addison Phillips
- Re: [Ltru] Extended language tags (long reply) Andrew Cunningham
- Re: [Ltru] Extended language tags (long reply) Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Extended language tags (long reply) Addison Phillips
- RE: [Ltru] Extended language tags Peter Constable
- RE: [Ltru] Extended language tags (long reply) Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] Extended language tags (long reply) John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Extended language tags (long reply) Marion Gunn
- Re: [Ltru] Extended language tags (long reply) Addison Phillips
- Re: [Ltru] Extended language tags (long reply) John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Extended language tags Randy Presuhn
- [Ltru] Informative (was: Extended language tags) Frank Ellermann
- [Ltru] Re: Extended language tags Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: Informative (was: Extended language ta… Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Informative (was: Extended languag… John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Extended language tags Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Informative (was: Extended languag… Randy Presuhn
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Extended language tags Shawn Steele
- RE: [Ltru] Extended language tags (long reply) Shawn Steele
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Informative Addison Phillips
- Re: [Ltru] Extended language tags (long reply) Addison Phillips
- RE: [Ltru] Extended language tags (long reply) - … Shawn Steele
- Re: [Ltru] Extended language tags (long reply) - … Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Extended language tags Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Extended language tags Addison Phillips
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Extended language tags Debbie Garside
- Re: [Ltru] Extended language tags (long reply) Mark Davis
- RE: [Ltru] Extended language tags (long reply) Debbie Garside
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Extended language tags Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Extended language tags Karen_Broome
- RE: [Ltru] Extended language tags (long reply) Shawn Steele
- RE: [Ltru] Extended language tags (long reply) Karen_Broome
- RE: [Ltru] Extended language tags (long reply) Peter Constable
- RE: [Ltru] Extended language tags (long reply) Karen_Broome
- RE: [Ltru] Extended language tags (long reply) Peter Constable
- [Ltru] Teleconference Shawn Steele
- Re: [Ltru] Teleconference Mark Davis
- RE: [Ltru] Extended language tags (long reply) Karen_Broome
- Re: [Ltru] Teleconference Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] Extended language tags (long reply) John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Teleconference Addison Phillips
- Re: [Ltru] Teleconference John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Extended language tags (long reply) Karen_Broome
- RE: [Ltru] Extended language tags (long reply) Peter Constable
- RE: [Ltru] Extended language tags (long reply) Karen_Broome
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Extended language tags Doug Ewell
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Extended language tags Debbie Garside