[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)"

From: John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org>
To: Doug Ewell <dewell at roadrunner.com>
Cc: LTRU Working Group <ltru at ietf.org>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 01:48:01 -0500
In-reply-to: <000501c83960$e8e514f0$6601a8c0 at DGBP7M81>
References: <000501c83960$e8e514f0$6601a8c0 at DGBP7M81>

Doug Ewell scripsit:

> Description: Swahili (macrolanguage)
> Description: Swahili
> 
> But because of the no-inversion rule, it turns out we will be getting 
> rid of some of the 639-1/-2 names anyway (see "Sotho, Southern" above). 
> Is it still necessary to list both "X" and "X (macrolanguage)" as in the 
> Swahili example above?

I'd say remove the second line in favor of the first, which is definitive.

-- 
John Cowan
        cowan at ccil.org
                I am a member of a civilization. --David Brin


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)"
  - From: Mark Davis

References:
- [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)"
  - From: Doug Ewell

Prev by Date: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)"
Next by Date: Re: [Ltru] Re: no teleconference this week
Previous by thread: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)"
Next by thread: Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.