[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)"

From: "Mark Davis" <mark.davis at icu-project.org>
To: "Peter Constable" <petercon at microsoft.com>
Cc: Doug Ewell <dewell at roadrunner.com>, LTRU Working Group <ltru at ietf.org>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 11:30:50 -0800
In-reply-to: <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB83579561E514327E at NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <003701c839c9$b3342d50$6601a8c0 at DGBP7M81> <30b660a20712081115v7eb67a1ci52e43763e61be39f at mail.gmail.com> <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB83579561E514327E at NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

I suspected as much. Is that the case for all the other duplicates that have one of them defined in 639-2?

Mark

On Dec 8, 2007 11:24 AM, Peter Constable < petercon at microsoft.com> wrote:

It is coincidental that an Altaic language spoken in China and an unrelated isolate language spoken in China both happen to have "Ainu" as their English name.

Peter

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)"
  - From: Peter Constable

References:
- Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)"
  - From: Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)"
  - From: Mark Davis
- RE: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)"
  - From: Peter Constable

Prev by Date: Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)"
Next by Date: RE: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)"
Previous by thread: RE: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)"
Next by thread: RE: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.