[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, macrolanguages in section 4.1

From: "Frank Ellermann" <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de>
To: ltru at lists.ietf.org
Cc:
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 10:39:29 +0100
References: <20071207215557.GD3346 at mercury.ccil.org><fjeehd$q1c$1 at ger.gmane.org> <20071209055112.GG22311 at mercury.ccil.org>

John Cowan wrote:

>> what if ISO 639-3 adds 'ma' to the 'sh' set ?
 
> Not gonna happen.  Macedonian is bogus Bulgarian,
> not split-off Serbo-Croat.

Ugh, sorry, I confused "ma" with Montenegrin.

 Frank



_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

Follow-Ups:
- Montenegrin what-if (was RE: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, macrolanguages in section 4.1)
  - From: Peter Constable

References:
- [Ltru] Review of 4646bis-10, macrolanguages in section 4.1
  - From: John Cowan
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, macrolanguages in section 4.1
  - From: Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, macrolanguages in section 4.1
  - From: John Cowan

Prev by Date: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App. B
Next by Date: [Ltru] Re: The blunder of the year
Previous by thread: Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, macrolanguages in section 4.1
Next by thread: Montenegrin what-if (was RE: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, macrolanguages in section 4.1)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.