Please understand: I'm not among those opposed to this registration; I think it's a valid request, it looks like there probably is a user community, and so the main issue in my mind is how it relates to other things called 'ortograf'. But I still think on ietf-languages we want some operational bar, whether formalized or not. Granted, since RFC 1766 we have provided a very large number of tags that need to be supported but which would not get used. Those are made from a limited set of subtags, though, and there are implementations that need to provide certain support for each subtag (e.g. providing UI strings). Each added variant subtag adds to those support requirements. I think it's reasonable to ask that those be things that really are going to get used, and to protect ourselves from supporting junk. If I were to request a subtag "flibtgit" for some idiosyncratic form of expression I just invented, I'd hope it would get rejected. Maybe the rationale I gave below isn't the basis you'd want to use for rejecting it -- fine, come up with a different statement. At the end of the day, I'd hope you'd reject it. Peter. > -----Original Message----- > From: Randy Presuhn [mailto:randy_presuhn at mindspring.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 12:03 PM > To: LTRU Working Group > Subject: Re: [Ltru] RE: Proposal for a subtag registration (fr-2004- > ORTOGRAF) > > Hi - > > As a technical contributor... > > > From: "Peter Constable" <petercon at microsoft.com> > > To: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 7:04 PM > > Subject: [Ltru] RE: Proposal for a subtag registration (fr-2004- > ORTOGRAF) > > > > From: Stephane Bortzmeyer [mailto:bortzmeyer at nic.fr] > ... > >> Why? What does it buy us? Or which disease it protects us against? > > > > It protects lots of implementers from having to support subtags that > don't really get used. > ... > > I don't find this persuasive. After all, what does it mean to > "support" a subtag, > and is this any different from the situtation with respect to the > thousands of > language subtags referring to languages for which typical software will > have > absolutely no special support? As far as I can tell, the impact of > encountering > an unknown subtag is no greater than running into (or needing to > generate) > an unknown x-whatever. > > <rhetorical> > Which are we more likely to see deployed in, say, a public information > kiosk - > a browser with localization options for Gothic, for Klingon, or for > something > like a simplified French being discussed on the ietf- > languages at iana.org > list? (To me it appears to be more than merely a simplified > orthography, > if the pages I've read are any indication, since the writing I've seen > was > also characterized by extreme clarity and simplicity.) > </rhetorical> > > Randy > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ltru mailing list > Ltru at ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.