Well, it's been under discussion for a few years now. But the focused, recent discussion has mainly been in the "John Cowan throws..." and "Remove extlang..." thread, both started on or after 11/29. You'll also want to see the short "summary of recommendations..." thread from 12/1.
To clarify this a little for Nicolas: the plan to use extlangs was under discussion for a few years, while the plan NOT to use extlangs wasn't really considered until this past March. But while WG consensus was never declared on this topic, drafts have been written that bake the no-extlang approach into place, and it's widely understood that the debate is over.
-- Doug Ewell * Fullerton, California, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14 http://home.roadrunner.com/~dewell http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.htmlhttp://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages ˆ
_______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.