Yes, the index seems to be broken. The on the ietf web site says that it was updated Dec 16 but it is missing a whole bunch of stuff: http://www.ietf.org/iesg/1rfc_index.txt Andy > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephane Bortzmeyer [mailto:bortzmeyer at nic.fr] > Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 7:26 AM > To: David McWalter > Cc: Randy Presuhn; LTRU Working Group; Bill Fenner; > dromasca at avaya.com; Juergen Schoenwaelder; Andy Kessler > (kessler); Doug Ewell > Subject: Re: MIB textual conventions for Uri and LangTag > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 02:38:09PM -0000, David McWalter > <DMcW at dataconnection.com> wrote a message of 19 lines which said: > > > For information, the Uri and LangTag MIB textual > conventions have been > > published. Thanks again to all who helped and commented. > > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5017.txt (Uri, Uri255, Uri1024) > > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5131.txt (LangTag) > > 5131 is not even in > ftp://ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc-index.txt yet! > _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.