At 13:50 -0800 2008-02-23, Doug Ewell wrote: >I see from draft-4646bis-12, section 3.3 that this is being changed, >so that Michael and I will have to generate registration forms for >ISO-based changes, and IANA will have to archive them along with the >individually requested ones. This strikes me as pointless busy work >for Michael and me, but I won't fight to the death over it, since >ding so seems to have little or no effect of late. I probably >should have noticed this change sooner. Michael objects to pointless busywork. The reviewing process should not be made more difficult for the Reviewer. He should Review. >I've cc'd Michael on this, so he is aware of the extra work we have >in store. Recall that ISO-based changes often come several at a >time. > >>- "registrations" committed by RFC 4645 or draft-4645bis are a >>special case for which no forms are created or archived. This is >>covered in all four relevant RFCs/I-Ds: 4645 4646 4645bis and >>4646bis. > >I certainly agree with this. -- Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.