Doug Ewell wrote: > or the need to formally > reconfirm the Reviewer when 4646bis is published > (which we never did for 4646 or 3066). Actually, that's not true. There was "reconfirmation" (prehaps that is too strong a word) of Michael as the reviewer at least in the 3066->4646 changeover. > > I don't see a problem with saying: > > 1. There are two types of subtags, those that come from individual > requests and those that come from ISO or UN standards. You can tell > which are which from the syntax; you don't even need to look at the > Registry. This point is superfluous, as we'll see in a second. > > 2. New subtags and changes that come into being from individual > requests have registration forms; those that come from ISO or UN > standards do not. There are two types of *registration*. There are registrations required by rule and there are registrations by request. The latter includes a process for registering changes to ISO-assigned codes, which has actually been used. These changes appear in the archive. Registrations by rule do not. > >> Good point: should we relax the restriction on the LSR sending them as >> a batch to IANA? > > Speaking as the one who prepares things for Michael to send to IANA, and > occasionally the one who sends them, I don't support this. Surprised? > While it might be a good idea and save us some work, it would be a > non-trivial change in procedure, and now that we're in WG Last Call I > think the pain and delay of debating such a change is greater than the > potential benefit. Look how much we argued over whether IANA could be > trusted to put UTF-8 characters into the Registry correctly. > Hmm... I don't think it would be that big a change. In fact, it is limited to a single sentence in Section 3.3, which currently reads: -- Each individual subtag affected by a change MUST be sent to the ietf-languages list with its own registration form and in a separate message. -- ... to which we would add: -- Additions of new records MAY be batched together for submission to IANA as a set. -- Addison -- Addison Phillips Globalization Architect -- Yahoo! Inc. Chair -- W3C Internationalization Core WG Internationalization is an architecture. It is not a feature. _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.