Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 in section 3.6

["Debbie Garside" <debbie at ictmarketing.co.uk>]

Addison wrote:

> Shouldn't Infoterm be made the MA for ISO 639-1 in this list?

Yes.

Debbie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ltru-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces at ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Addison Phillips
> Sent: 18 March 2008 00:32
> To: 'LTRU Working Group'
> Subject: [Ltru] ISO 639 in section 3.6
>
> In section 3.6, we list various ISO MA/RAs for the standards
> we use and include addresses, etc., for them. I note that we
> inherit text from RFC
> 1766 and 3066 here about ISO 639. In particular, we have an MA for ISO
> 639-2 and one for ISO 639-3, but ISO 639-1 isn't mentioned
> here and we have Infoterm listed just generally as an MA for ISO 639.
>
> Shouldn't Infoterm be made the MA for ISO 639-1 in this list?
>
> Addison
>
> --
> Addison Phillips
> Globalization Architect -- Yahoo! Inc.
> Chair -- W3C Internationalization Core WG
>
> Internationalization is an architecture.
> It is not a feature.
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
>
>
>
>




_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru