Re: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action

[Addison Phillips <addison at yahoo-inc.com>]

+1

Mark Davis wrote:
> Very acceptable.
> 
> (Myself, I tend to blacklist the person involved in my email client as 
> soon as identified -- but of course that still leaves random clutter in 
> the archives.)
> 
> Mark
> 
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Randy Presuhn 
> <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com <mailto:randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi -
> 
>     As co-chair...
> 
>     It is suspected that someone whose posting privileges to the
>     ltru at ietf.org <mailto:ltru at ietf.org>
>     mailing list were revoked pursuant to an RFC 3683 PR-action has been
>     posting to the WG mailing list under one or more pseudonyms.  While
>     RFC 3683 recognizes the possibility of such misbehavior, it does not
>     prescribe a means of determining when such a situation exists.  As
>     suggested by our area director, we propose the following metric:
> 
>     1. All chairs and the responsible area director agree that the
>     identified
>     email address is the person subject to a PR action.
> 
>     2. At least one independent participant of the list is informed that a
>     suspected violation of a PR action is in progress without being
>     informed of
>     the suspect posting address or addresses.  That participant must
>     independently identify the same posting address or addresses as the WG
>     chairs & AD.
> 
>     The list should be informed when the metric is applied.
> 
>     Of course, this action would be subject to the usual appeal process.
> 
>     We'd like to get a read on whether the working group feels this would be
>     adequate.  I understand "independent participants" in our context as
>     list
>     subscribers (other than the chairs, ADs, and editors) who give some
>     indication (such as recent postings) that would indicate that they are
>     actually reading the list.  Martin and I think consulting three such
>     participants should provide an adequate degree of confidence that the
>     corrent address(es) have been identified, since that would mean that
>     a total of six people have all come to the same conclusion about what
>     postings were in question and who the poster might be.
> 
>     Please respond to the ltru at ietf.org <mailto:ltru at ietf.org> list
>     indicating whether you find
>     this to be an acceptiable approach.
> 
>     Randy
> 



-- 
Addison Phillips
Globalization Architect -- Yahoo! Inc.
Chair -- W3C Internationalization Core WG

Internationalization is an architecture.
It is not a feature.
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru