If anyone has something to contribute to the HTTP working group, which is clearing up HTTP / RFC 2616...
--- Begin Message ---
- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de>
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg at w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:02:01 +0200
Hi, (see also <http://www3.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/13>).So far we have delayed the resolution 13 until we're done with the ABNF conversion, but since then we have made other changes to the ABNF anyway. Therefore, I'd like to get this one resolved; there's doesn't seem to be anything holding it up...:Section 3.5., paragraph 2: OLD: The syntax and registry of HTTP language tags is the same as that defined by [RFC1766]. In summary, a language tag is composed of 1 or more parts: A primary language tag and a possibly empty series of subtags: NEW: The syntax and registry of HTTP language tags is the same as that defined by [RFC4646]. In summary, a language tag is composed of one or more parts: A primary language tag and a possibly empty series of subtags, Section 3.5., paragraph 3: OLD: language-tag = primary-tag *( "-" subtag ) primary-tag = 1*8ALPHA subtag = 1*8ALPHA NEW: language-tag = <Language-Tag, defined in [RFC4646], Section 2.1> Section 3.5., paragraph 4: OLD: White space is not allowed within the tag and all tags are case- insensitive. The name space of language tags is administered by the IANA. Example tags include: NEW: White space is not allowed within the tag and all tags are case- insensitive. The name space of language tags is administered by the IANA (<http://www.iana.org/assignments/language-tags>). Example tags include: Section 3.5., paragraph 6: OLD: where any two-letter primary-tag is an ISO-639 language abbreviation and any two-letter initial subtag is an ISO-3166 country code. (The last three tags above are not registered tags; all but the last are examples of tags which could be registered in future.) NEW: (The last three tags above are not registered tags; all but the last are examples of tags which could be registered in future.) See RFC 4646 for further information. ...feedback appreciated. Julian
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.