[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Fwd: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis

From: pektiong <pektiong at gmail.com>
To: LTRU Working Group <ltru at ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 13:43:22 +0800
In-reply-to: <OFF618FB86.79BE7E38-ON88257442.001DD0DE-88257442.001DD0F4 at spe.sony.com>
References: <OFF618FB86.79BE7E38-ON88257442.001DD0DE-88257442.001DD0F4 at spe.sony.com>

-----ltru-bounces at ietf.org wrote: -----

To: LTRU Working Group <ltru at ietf.org>
From: pektiong <pektiong at gmail.com>
Sent by: ltru-bounces at ietf.org
Date: 05/06/2008 07:30PM
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Fwd: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis

Hi there,

First, I would like to state that even in written form using Hant/s/
i, the written Minnan/Hakka/Mandarin CAN BE mutually intelligible.

Sorry, should be CAN BE "NOT mutually intelligible"

Cheers

Pochung

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

Prev by Date: Re: [Ltru] Knowing about the use of language tags
Next by Date: Re: [Ltru] I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis
Previous by thread: [Ltru] going back to the roots to find a solution to "zh"
Next by thread: [Ltru] default for q-values in Accept-Language and elsewhere
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.