Peter Constable <petercon at microsoft dot com> wrote: > Very strong +1. I feel we should not be stipulating or even suggesting > that zh is the same as cmn, or that cmn should be deprecated. Saying > that, in general, zh content is most often Mandarin is fine. I am perfectly fine with that idea, and perfectly not fine with the similar-sounding but quite different idea that 'zh' is most often *used to mean* Mandarin. In the flood of messages on this topic, I can't find the statement in the archives that 'cmn' should be deprecated. I hope to heaven that is a misquote. -- Doug Ewell * Arvada, Colorado, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14 http://www.ewellic.org http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages ˆ _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.