Peter Constable <petercon at microsoft dot com> wrote: > In terms of process and data integrity, I'm with Doug on this: don't > conflate a data category; if you want pointers in both directions, > have separate fields, or just treat your "true" data point as an > informative annotation, adding "This is a macrolanguage entry" (or > something like that) as a comment. Choose one: 1. The annotation is required for all macrolanguage records. 2. The annotation is in the Comments field. -- Doug Ewell * Arvada, Colorado, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14 http://www.ewellic.org http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages ˆ _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.