On 13/05/2008, Shawn Steele <Shawn.Steele at microsoft.com> wrote: > To me the value of extlang would be to allow additional information in existing protocols that don't allow "lists" of language tags, and it seems kind of like a specialized list to me. In cases where lists are acceptable, I think that a non-extlang form would be acceptable. (Because you can specify zh;cmn or whatever). > it should be extlangs or no extlangs, anything else woud be too confusing, too complex -- Andrew Cunningham Vicnet Research and Development Coordinator State Library of Victoria Australia andrewc at vicnet.net.au lang.support at gmail.com _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.