Hello Debbie, At 19:19 08/05/12, Debbie Garside wrote: >For me, record-jar is a dogs breakfast. > >If we really want Joe Public to start tagging data correctly we need to >facilitate the provision of data in an XML format that can be imported into >proprietary software. Frank and I did some work on this many moons ago and >we were about 99% of the way there - this needs to be completed and made >publicly available. I'm not suggesting that this should form part of the >RFC but a tool should be created and (if possible) referenced within the >RFC. (perhaps via Stephane's site) As a co-chair, I'm asking you to try to use as little WG mailing list bandwidth for this as possible, and to always clearly tag things in the subject line (as done above). >And, whilst I am busy sticking spanners in the works, I would like to bring >up the idea (again) of being able to reference the RFC within the tag (if >desired). This is extremely important for archiving purposes. From a technical viewpoint, this seems to be an extremely good fit for an extension. However, as a co-chair, I know that individual extensions are not the job of this WG. If you want, please go ahead and write an individual Internet-Draft. But again, don't bother this list more than necessary, this is clearly outside the scope of the current WG. Regards, Martin. #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.