[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Record-Jar Format (was RE: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis)

From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic.fr>
To: Doug Ewell <doug at ewellic.org>
Cc: LTRU Working Group <ltru at ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 14:06:36 +0200
In-reply-to: <001401c8b4a7$276381f0$e6f5e547 at DGBP7M81>
References: <mailman.53.1210605807.5128.ltru at ietf.org> <001401c8b4a7$276381f0$e6f5e547 at DGBP7M81>

On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 09:12:18PM -0600,
 Doug Ewell <doug at ewellic.org> wrote 
 a message of 8 lines which said:

> You can do that now, but that's a higher-level protocol.  Just as
> one example, you could embed your language tag in an RFC 4151 tag:

Another nice example is RFC 5141 :

     urn:iso:std:iso:9999:-1:ed-1:en,fr
      refers to the 1st edition of ISO 9999-1, in English/French
      (bilingual document)
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

Follow-Ups:
- [Ltru] OT Not Really Referencing the RFC within the tag was( RE: Record-Jar Format (was RE: I'm really confused bychinese in 3066bis)
  - From: Debbie Garside

References:
- Re: [Ltru] Record-Jar Format (was RE: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis)
  - From: Doug Ewell

Prev by Date: Re: [Ltru] Fwd: 72nd IETF - Working Group/BOF Scheduling - REMINDER
Next by Date: Re: [Ltru] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-05.txt
Previous by thread: Re: [Ltru] Record-Jar Format (was RE: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis)
Next by thread: [Ltru] OT Not Really Referencing the RFC within the tag was( RE: Record-Jar Format (was RE: I'm really confused bychinese in 3066bis)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.