[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Record-Jar Format (was RE: I'm really confused by chinese in 3066bis)



Debbie Garside scripsit:
> For me, record-jar is a dogs breakfast.

It's formally defined and has certain technical advantages.

> And, whilst I am busy sticking spanners in the works, I would like to bring
> up the idea (again) of being able to reference the RFC within the tag (if
> desired).  This is extremely important for archiving purposes.

The official denotation of a tag (as opposed to any unofficial
connotations it may have acquired over time) is independent of which
RFC was in force at the time it was defined.

-- 
John Cowan  cowan at ccil.org  http://ccil.org/~cowan
Linguistics is arguably the most hotly contested property in the academic
realm. It is soaked with the blood of poets, theologians, philosophers,
philologists, psychologists, biologists and neurologists, along with
whatever blood can be got out of grammarians. - Russ Rymer
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru



Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.