I'd still like to know the source you used, Debbie, because, as presented in your original msg, it looks non-standard. If it is just down to presentation, maybe you could also cut and paste the hierarchy of Continental Celtic (as you understand it to be) into your next msg, to give us some context by which to judge that? mg Scríobh Debbie Garside: > Hi Marion > > The conversation was specifically about Gaulish and I was showing just that > aspect which happened to include Lepontic as I cut and paste it from my > list. > > Best > > Debbie > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ltru-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces at ietf.org] On >> Behalf Of Marion Gunn >> Sent: 15 May 2008 12:06 >> To: 'LTRU Working Group' >> Subject: Re: [Ltru] Preferred Values for Irregular Tags >> >> >> Where did you get the input you give below for ISO FDIS >> 639-6, Debbie? >> Here are the usual divisions of Continental Celtic [sic] in use in our >> universities: Lepontic, Celtiberian, Gaulish, Galatian. >> mg >> >> ltru >> >> Scríobh Debbie Garside: >> >>> Within ISO FDIS 639-6 data the hierarchy is as follows: >>> >>> ineu wrld Indo-European >>> cltc ineu Celtic >>> cclc cltc Celtic Continental >>> lptc cclc Lepontic >>> glsh cclc Gaulish >>> xcg glsh Cisalpine Gaulish >>> xtg glsh Transalpine Gaulish >>> >>> >>> If anyone has any comments/better ideas now is the time to >>> >> say so as I >> >>> am just putting the final touches to the data. >>> >>> best >>> >>> Debbie -- Marion Gunn * EGTeo (Estab.1991) 27 Páirc an Fhéithlinn, Baile an Bhóthair, Co. Átha Cliath, Éire. * mgunn at egt.ie * eamonn at egt.ie * _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.