Hi - As WG co-chair... Ok, I've tallied the responses. One was sent directly to me, rather than to the ltru at ietf.org mailing list. One was sent after the deadline. Here's the tally including those two: Q1: A-4 B-9 C-4 Q2: A-8 B-5 C-4 Excluding those two responses, it looks like: Q1: A-3 B-9 C-3 Q2: A-7 B-5 C-3 >From this I'm concluding that we have a *rough* consensus to "reinstate" extlang. This was not an easy decision, and it was not undertaken lightly, particularly since we'd been working on the assumption that we'd polished of the extlang issue some months ago. However, with equal numbers objecting to each of the proposals, and a 2-to-1 preference for Q2 among those favoring a proposal, I think the sense of the WG is clear enough for us to move on. Randy ltru co-chair _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.