Doug Ewell 2008-05-29 05.45: > Leif Halvard Silli <lhs at malform dot no> wrote: > >>> While we can provide constructive feedback, we should not allow >>> ourselves or others to confuse this with "running" ISO or taking over >>> their work items. >> >> Seriously, let's allow others to care for their own confusion. ;-) > > The problem is worse than you might think. We've been accused in the > past of trying to overrun ISO. It's important (at least to me) that we > don't set ourselves up for such false accusations. In that regard: Do you think that it is possible that extlang in itself could be misperceived by ISO? Could the ISO think that LTRU *wants* them to define Macrolanguaes, which then would become extlang tagged - or something like that? Or, could ISO begin wanting to interfer with this group, or perhaps refrain from defining macrolanguages, picking other methods for grouping languages, because they don't like the extlang tagging that it leads to? -- leif halvard silli _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.