> > 4. Permit implementations to treat the 'language' > > production as atomic (that is, the sequence "zh-yue" MAY be treated > as > > if it were a single subtag but MAY be treated as separate subtags, > > notably by existing implementations). Note that the 'language' > production > > is the one that includes both the primary and extended language > subtags. > > I'd rather not put this in 4646bis. If it's necessary to talk about > this > kind of thing at all, it would belong in an update to the matching RFC. > I tend to agree. The main thing I'm doing here is pointing out the ramifications of doing this. I would assume that some text in the "Choice" and "extlang" sections would spell out why these languages were treated specially and what using the extended language subtag would mean. Addison _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.