Phillips, Addison scripsit:
> Really? 'sgn'?
See my post responding to Peter. I"d rather deprecate "sgn-US" to
"sgn-ase" rather than just "ase".
> That's what I had in mind. Note that 4647 would not necessarily diverge
> from 2616. It could be done as a note in Lookup, for example and 2616
> doesn't do Lookup.
True, but then it would deviate from how lookup is actually implemented
in various places, like JVM resource bundles and Apache (when filtering
fails).
--
Go, and never darken my towels again! John Cowan
--Rufus T. Firefly http://ccil.org/~cowan
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.