[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example

From: Peter Constable <petercon at microsoft.com>
To: LTRU Working Group <ltru at ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 16:05:51 -0700
In-reply-to: <483F1E46.5010003 at malform.no>
References: <mailman.636.1211925384.15310.ltru at ietf.org> <004d01c8c065$838b8d50$e6f5e547 at DGBP7M81> <008001c8c105$cc421820$64c64860$ at net> <001501c8c121$646ebe80$e6f5e547 at DGBP7M81> <483E14ED.6030100 at malform.no> <002601c8c13e$60217e40$e6f5e547 at DGBP7M81> <483E3D68.1080202 at malform.no> <004901c8c155$419bf560$e6f5e547 at DGBP7M81> <4D25F22093241741BC1D0EEBC2DBB1DA013A84C39D at EX-SEA5-D.ant.amazon.com> <483EFFDA.7020401 at malform.no> <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB835795633304EB66 at NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <483F1E46.5010003 at malform.no>

> From: Leif Halvard Silli [mailto:lhs at malform.no]

> > "no" has been deprecated in ISO 639 for many years now,
>
>
> This was news to me. Perhaps you are wrong on this? I don't find
> it logical.

My bad: this is yet another case in which I've assumed past practice in one part of 639 to imply similar practice in other parts of 639. Unlike "sh", which was deprecated when "hr" and "sr" were added, "no" was not deprecated when "nb" and "nn" were added.

Even so, the point I was making remains valid: "no-nb" or "no-nob" or "no-nn" or "no-nno" would not be compatible with existing usage.


Peter



_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example
  - From: Phillips, Addison

References:
- Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situatation as example
  - From: Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situatation as example
  - From: Don Osborn
- Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situatation as example
  - From: Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situatation as example
  - From: Leif Halvard Silli
- Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example
  - From: Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example
  - From: Leif Halvard Silli
- Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example
  - From: Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example
  - From: Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example
  - From: Leif Halvard Silli
- Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example
  - From: Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example
  - From: Leif Halvard Silli

Prev by Date: Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang
Next by Date: Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example
Previous by thread: Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example
Next by thread: Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.