[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example
Phillips, Addison 2008-05-30 01.45:
>> Even so, the point I was making remains valid: "no-nb" or
>> "no-nob" or "no-nn" or "no-nno" would not be compatible with
>> existing usage.
>
> The tags "no-nb" and "no-nn"
Please note that I don't advocate this case anymore.
--
leif halvard silli
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
- References:
- Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situatation as example
- Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situatation as example
- Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situatation as example
- Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situatation as example
- Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example
- Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example
- Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example
- Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example
- Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example
- Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example
- Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example
- Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example
- Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.