[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang



[co-chair hat on]

Hello Doug, others,

Two points:

1) One of the ideas of a consensus call is exactly that everybody,
   including people who don't think of themselves as skilled debaters
   or tenacious fighters, but who nevertheless may have well-founded
   technical opinions, can express their preferences (even in private
   if they deem that necessary).
   [Of course, expressing preferences includes "about as neutral as
    it gets" B-B opinions.]

2) All of Doug's postings (occasionally some others) seem to lose
   all their linebreaks when they arrive at my mailbox. Anybody has
   any idea why?

Regards,    Martin.

At 15:12 08/05/29, Doug Ewell wrote:
>Karen Broome <Karen underscore Broome at spe dot sony dot com> wrote: > >> 
>Phrases like "throws in the towel," "my resistance is gone," "as >> neutral 
>as I can be" ... Something does not feel good about this. > >What has become 
>evident to me is that I am neither the most skilled >debater nor the most 
>tenacious fighter in the group, and this battle is >going to be won and the 
>fence-sitters influenced by those who are. > >As I would like to be able to 
>continue working with others in this group >in the future, there is really 
>little more I can say about this. > >-- >Doug Ewell  *  Arvada, Colorado, USA  
>*  RFC 4645  *  UTN 
>#14 >http://www.ewellic.org >http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html >http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages 
> ヒ«>_______________________________________________ >Ltru mailing 
>list >Ltru at ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltr


#-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-#  http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp       mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp     

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.