[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] extlang for users

From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic.fr>
To: John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org>
Cc: LTRU Working Group <ltru at ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 21:34:27 +0200
In-reply-to: <20080527200607.GD27379 at mercury.ccil.org>
References: <20080527000859.7a70d079 at sil-mh4> <20080526200237.GA19588 at sources.org> <20080527140411.GB18303 at mercury.ccil.org> <20080527194323.GA16248 at sources.org> <20080527200607.GD27379 at mercury.ccil.org>

On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 04:06:07PM -0400,
 John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org> wrote 
 a message of 18 lines which said:

>  Are there any obvious errors in the English version?

No. No problem.

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

References:
- [Ltru] extlang for users
  - From: Martin Hosken
- Re: [Ltru] extlang for users
  - From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [Ltru] extlang for users
  - From: John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] extlang for users
  - From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [Ltru] extlang for users
  - From: John Cowan

Prev by Date: Re: [Ltru] 639-5 (was RE: ISO 639 language code addition rules...)
Next by Date: Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules...
Previous by thread: Re: [Ltru] extlang for users
Next by thread: [Ltru] [OT] Web archiving software is brittle (was: Re: Consensus call: extlang)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.