> > I think the idea was, all ISO 639-3 encompassed languages should be > added to the LSR with a "Macrolanguage" field, but only those with > a > macrolanguage mapping to 'zho' (and did we decide about 'ara'?) > should > be extlangs. This should be clarified. I presented this as an idea for resolving the impasse we seem to face, but it hasn't been ratified anywhere as yet. I think it garnered some support, but await the co-chairs recognition of it as a rough consensus item. Addison _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.