"Phillips, Addison" <addison at amazon dot com> wrote: > I support 'sgn'... I also note that it was in draft-09 (draft-10 > removed extlang), so I'm having to deal with it as a previous > consensus item. We just need to be clear that 'sgn' as a prefix for extlangs would be our own doing, and would not be based on 'sgn' being an ISO 639-3 macrolanguage, since it is not one. -- Doug Ewell * Arvada, Colorado, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14 http://www.ewellic.org http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages ˆ _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.