[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules...



I support 'sgn'... I also note that it was in draft-09 (draft-10 removed extlang), so I'm having to deal with it as a previous consensus item.

Addison

Addison Phillips
Globalization Architect -- Lab126

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Cowan [mailto:cowan at ccil.org]
> Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 11:21 AM
> To: Phillips, Addison
> Cc: Doug Ewell; LTRU Working Group; John Cowan
> Subject: Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules...
>
> Phillips, Addison scripsit:
>
> > I presented this as an idea for resolving the impasse we seem to
> face,
> > but it hasn't been ratified anywhere as yet. I think it garnered
> > some support, but await the co-chairs recognition of it as a
> rough
> > consensus item.
>
> Among the people who are willing to compromise at all, I think
> there is
> strong support for 'zh', weak support for 'sgn' (maybe only from
> me),
> and no support for 'ar' (you mentioned it as a hypothetical).
>
> --
> An observable characteristic is not necessarily         John Cowan
> a functional requirement.  --John Hudson
> cowan at ccil.org
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru



Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.