I support 'sgn'... I also note that it was in draft-09 (draft-10 removed extlang), so I'm having to deal with it as a previous consensus item. Addison Addison Phillips Globalization Architect -- Lab126 Internationalization is not a feature. It is an architecture. > -----Original Message----- > From: John Cowan [mailto:cowan at ccil.org] > Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 11:21 AM > To: Phillips, Addison > Cc: Doug Ewell; LTRU Working Group; John Cowan > Subject: Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules... > > Phillips, Addison scripsit: > > > I presented this as an idea for resolving the impasse we seem to > face, > > but it hasn't been ratified anywhere as yet. I think it garnered > > some support, but await the co-chairs recognition of it as a > rough > > consensus item. > > Among the people who are willing to compromise at all, I think > there is > strong support for 'zh', weak support for 'sgn' (maybe only from > me), > and no support for 'ar' (you mentioned it as a hypothetical). > > -- > An observable characteristic is not necessarily John Cowan > a functional requirement. --John Hudson > cowan at ccil.org _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.