> From: John Cowan [mailto:cowan at ccil.org] > > Between 639-5 and 639-3, it looks like 639-2 would be redundant for > > our purposes. > > Almost. The four special code elements 'mis', 'mul', 'und', and 'zxx' > are in -2 but not -5 or -3, and in principle new code elements of this > type could be added to -2. So we can't completely exclude adding > subtags from -2. They are in -3, actually, and I'd expect any added specials to be in both. (The text of -3 is a bit inconsistent re this and could be improved.) Peter _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.