> From: ltru-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Doug Ewell > > The JAC has a guideline not to add an alpha-2 in case an alpha-3 > > previously existed, though that is not a binding rule. The JAC has > > also informally agreed to adopt a very high bar for alpha-2 additions, > > making new alpha-2 additions less likely. > > ... was that it might be better if ISO 639-* changed that to a binding > rule: no more alpha-2's, period. Well, since the JAC can't control what TCs 37 and 46 might choose to do, the JAC can't make any binding guarantee. The best we can do is set a very high bar, and so far that's sticking. Peter _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.