[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] ISO 639 language code addition rules...



At 03:20 08/06/02, John Cowan wrote:
>Phillips, Addison scripsit:
>
>> I presented this as an idea for resolving the impasse we seem to face,
>> but it hasn't been ratified anywhere as yet. I think it garnered
>> some support, but await the co-chairs recognition of it as a rough
>> consensus item.
>
>Among the people who are willing to compromise at all, I think there is
>strong support for 'zh', weak support for 'sgn' (maybe only from me),
>and no support for 'ar' (you mentioned it as a hypothetical).

Just to make sure this is not overlooked, I supported 'ar' in a different
thread.

Regards,    Martin.


#-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-#  http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp       mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp     

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru



Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.