Mark Davis scripsit: > We can live with having extlang if limited to only zh and possibly ar or > sgn, and as long as we include Shawn's proviso, that the non-extlang > versions (eg "yue-Hant") be also valid. That is, one of the two equivalent > forms can be deprecated with a preferred value of the other. Same objection as for 639-5. Also, which is to be pre-deprecated, and why? -- John Cowan http://ccil.org/~cowan cowan at ccil.org The Penguin shall hunt and devour all that is crufty, gnarly and bogacious; all code which wriggles like spaghetti, or is infested with blighting creatures, or is bound by grave and perilous Licences shall it capture. And in capturing shall it replicate, and in replicating shall it document, and in documentation shall it bring freedom, serenity and most cool froodiness to the earth and all who code therein. --Gospel of Tux _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.