Mark Davis scripsit: > Add+deprecate allows people to have the forms they really care about, and > yet preserves a formal relationship between them, so that people can convert > between them. That's a good point. > We're trying to find a compromise here, so that we can work our way out of > this impasse! Agreed. > As to which is deprecated, the simpler way would be to deprecate the extlang > form, as Addison said. If it were necessary to achieve a compromise, we > could live with deprecating the conventional form. I can live with pre-deprecation, provided it is the conventional form that is pre-deprecated. -- A rose by any other name John Cowan may smell as sweet, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan but if you called it an onion cowan at ccil.org you'd get cooks very confused. --RMS _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.