At 17:31 08/06/02, Martin Duerst wrote: >[co-chair hat on] Still on. >On the other hand, I don't remember seeing anybody actively >opposing to this proposal, which is definitely a good sign. >If you have support/comments, or a somewhat different proposal >for a compromize, don't hesitate to send it to the list. Actually, this was inaccurate, Karen expressed her concerns. Karen, could you be more explicit about where this proposal makes your guidance task worse? Is the main problem with the fact that there would be two allowed ways to tag e.g. Cantonese, one of them deprecated? Or is the main problem that there would be only extlangs for Chinese and Arabic, but not for some other languages (e.g. Malay)? Or anything else? Regards, Martin. #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.